11/24/06
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
Fredo
I was similarly puzzled by that. WTF? I assume there is some logical explaination that i am just not getting...
11/24/06
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
bsr
you think you live in a democracy?
edited: Nov 24 2006
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
Otterfan
Chuck Rangel is the Congressman who proposes brining the draft back. For a US congressman, he's a liberal. He was arrested a couple of years ago for trespassing at the Sudanese embassy to protest human rights abuses.
He wants to do it for two reasons:
1) He claims that since the draft was eliminated the military has been disproportionately made up of the poor and minorities. The draft would make it more reflective of the US population. The minority part of this argument has some problems (the Army is socially progressive--at least on racial issues--and lots of minorities join for the opportunities), but the class issue is definitely real, at least in the enlisted corps.
2) This is the important one. He claims that the leadership would be less likely to start wars if they knew it meant risking the lives of the sons and daughters of a large proportion of their constituency--and presumably the leaders' own children as well. It's a lot easier for George Bush to send troops to Iraq if he only has to worry about a bunch of poor rural kids than if, say, Rupert Murdoch's grandkids are going to be on the front line.
I'd add a third reason as well:
3) It would bring left-wingers back into the military discussion. The military has grown progressively more and more right-wing since the 60s. Most liberals (especially before 2001) treated the army like it was unclean. They didn't join, they didn't support it, and they didn't bother learning how it worked. If they get drafted as young people, they'll become involved.
I've got a kind of unique perspective on this: when I was a kid my dad was a far left-wing (especially for the military) instructor at the US Military Academy. He was often the only real exposure cadets would get to liberal ideas. He always believed the draft should be reinstated, so that soldiers could be exposed to a more diverse range of political views.
Despite how a lot of the left feel, the military is important and (in some form) necessary. I'd like to think that if more progressive heads were running the military over the last few years we'd have no troops in Iraq, a functioning government in Afghanastan, and maybe even a monitored peace in Darfur.
I'm not sure how I feel about the draft. It was eliminated because the rich were finding ways around it, and the Army claims that they can train soldiers better under the current system. Still, it's an idea that should be discussed, and I think Rangel should be heard.
Of course, this being a democracy, the chances of the draft actually getting reinstated are pretty low.
11/24/06
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
jcd
Thanks Otterfan, that answers a lot of questions about this whole thing that I haven't seen addressed otherwise. People (especially those on TV, who have an opportunity to discuss issues and inform their veiwers) seem to prefer false rage to honest inquiry.
11/29/06
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
bbwax
1. democrats = republicans = democrats = republicans = military industrial congressional complex.
2. ask yourself why are there no strong 3rd parties in this country?
3. see bsr's comment above.
11/29/06
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
ejectorset
see that is why i dont like/trust democrats or buy into their crap. the hypocrasy of it all.
at least with someone like gwb you know he is all about guns and oil and war and money and rich people and shit. you knew that before he got elected.
the draft seems like the anti-democrat/liberal thing.
make people that don't want to go to war, go to war.
what happened the old school sit around and smoke weed and make signs that say "make love not war" attitude?