Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
New blog... and epic battle with "huminoid lizards&qu
StoreTags: adcbicycle blog
Author: adcBicycle on July 17 2006
Viewed 2939 times. 5 people liked this blog. You can rate it below if you haven't already.
People who enjoyed reading this: tylth, celibacyclub, Zanf, prhi22m, p
--> hi everyone.
After many years of careful planning... I've finally taken the plunge and started my own blog.
link

My latest post is about the "we're taking over the world richard" sample on the so titled track on my album. A dramatic tale of a famous conspiracy theorists and a stong minded lawyer locked in heated battle... free speech vs. human writes ... who will win !? The far right hate groups or the middle-aged balding man?!! Tune in to find out!!

Read adcBicycle's other blogs.adcBicycle's Recent Blogs
Comments

this is david icke talking so you can work out if it is him who called. Video&search=david%20icke

He used to be a goalkeeper for Southampton back in the day and then presented sports programmes for a bit before he became all 'new age'. Heis final downfall from public grace was when he appeared on a tv chat show called Wogan (presented by terry 'syruphead' wogan) and claimed he was the son of god/a jesus figure.

that doesnt sound like him though

awsome.

link

thanks zanf.
I think you're right... Icke's voice seems to be a little deeper, and more confident. Maybe the telephone changed the pitch though?

thanks for the link cclub... tis done link

i think there is a bit of something to the lizard thing. maybe a cerebral cortex lizard brain greed or something. but i steer clear of the anti semetic bullshit.

This doc is a really excellent exploration of Icke and the bizarre lizard/jews issue: link

In my opinion, it is indeed Icke who called you. Great album BTW!

Plissken - good link. I like watching Jon Ronson docus. Plus he also used to manage 'The Men From Del Monte'!

I have to say that the lot from the Anti-Deformation League are just as closed minded as poor deluded Mr Icke is. They come across as intent on laying a preformed opinion levelling accusations of anti-semetism into peoples minds and not allowing access to him/the info to make their own minds up. The scene where they had that meeting and the one guy said he hadnt made his mind up and it was said that some people were uncomfortable with the guy remaining and it wasnt a debate. wtf??? They lost my vote right there. 'We want your support to stop this alledged anti-semite but we wont debate or share our information with you so you can decide about it'.

Im very much with Alex Jones - Icke has all the 'meat and potatoes' of what Alex says and goes and 'shits in the punch bowel' and ruins it all with the lizard bollocks.

Sorry but that Richard Warman and expressing that he wants to have David Ickes books incinerated is the very same actions of a certain past Germanic regime. And the whole 'I wouldnt encourage anyone to assault someone with a custard pie especially at this bookshop at this time' is retarded fucking bullshit. either win your argument with clear concise unassailable logic or fuck off back under your rock if you encourage or support backdoor violence..

'careful when fighting monsters lest ye become one'

Yeah, thanks for this link plissken... really enjoyed watching that.

I agree zanf... stopping him from speaking and burning his books is a pretty stupid thing to do. Especially because lots of what he says is pretty in line with what the anti-icke group believes.

This was a pretty damn one sided doc though. The documentary did add some good arguments from the anti-icke side, but really it was super pro icke... he does host this film on his website don't forget. Like the scene you talk about zanf, about the meeting not being a debate, I'm pretty sure that was taken entirely out of context... the documentary makers comments and the editing makes the meeting holders look pretty closed minded.

None the less, very interesting to watch.

Yeah, thanks for this link plissken... really enjoyed watching that.

I agree zanf... stopping him from speaking and burning his books is a pretty stupid thing to do. Especially because lots of what he says is pretty in line with what the anti-icke group believes.

This was a pretty damn one sided doc though. The documentary did add some good arguments from the anti-icke side, but really it was super pro icke... he does host this film on his website don't forget. Like the scene you talk about zanf, about the meeting not being a debate, I'm pretty sure that was taken entirely out of context... the documentary makers comments and the editing makes the meeting holders look pretty closed minded.

None the less, very interesting to watch.
That's true. That scene seems like something's missing. But in defense of the doc, it ends on that sour note where the filmmakers overhear one of Icke's people saying something about "the fat Jew". But in general I found the film fascinating... it had the air of a microcosm, like you are watching a living metaphor for larger disputes. Because like you say, the sides are so similar... if the fringe left can't even get on with each other, what hope do the rest of us have?

And, it's hard to take anyone seriously who claims to be the son of God (sorry, Jesus). As a general rule, even if you *are* a deity, keep it on the downlow for a while, huh?

your talk reminds me of this link

I have read hundreds of times of knowlege gleaned from psychadelic substances that people had seen aliens or electric gnomes or lizard people that could be discerned from a large crowd of people by telltale signs. If psychadelic experience is to be trusted as shamanic vision (which could be argued largely due to the frequency of these types of visions) then one could hypothesize that these people were awakened to the truth that there are shadow beings hiding among us.

It's a crazy stretch to derive an anti-semetic message from thoughts like this.

congrats on your publication acdbicycle!

In regards to the sub topic of David Icke.
I think that guy is really interesting. Like the guy ousted from the meeting I haven't made my mind up about him. I too remember watching that interview on Wogan (for you Yank's Wogan was as big as Letterman during the late 80's) I too laughed at him, but I think his more recent agenda against the NWO/illuminati is intriguing. As for the references towards lizard men, what the fuck is going on there? How can I be expected to believe that? If he has the evidence to prove that certain key figures are trans-dimentional beings, why isn't anyone doing anything to uncover them?
As for the ADL, what is there agenda? to say that when someone says something as wild as lizard men are ruling the world, how do they perceive that as 'Jew's'? Maybe it's unfortunate, but after taking in the facts, I'm for the guy that believes that the Queen Mother was a blood-drinking space alien, even if that does seem a little too wild.

I own the noise factory album....grand!

Today someone posted a comment about this icke-warman blog... and it very well could be the ickeman himself in my opinion. link
I don't quite get what it's saying... all the capital letters hurt my ears.

"TO YOUR OWN AMUSEMENT YOU MAY RIDICUE ANYONE YOU LIKE. BUT AS FOR PUBLIC RITES OF RIDICULE, ARE YOU WILLING TO ACCEPT THAT AS A WHOLESALE FORM OF COMMUNICATION THAT YOU WELCOME ON ALL FRONTS. RICHARD WARMAN DID COMMIT A CRIME BY DIRECTLY SOLICITING THE ASSAULT OF ICKE THROUGH DIRECT INFLUENCE AND ACTION. WARMAN( what is his name again...war...man) IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE POTENTIAL INJURY RESULTING FROM THROWING OBJECTS AT THE MAN, AND FOR DESTROYING PRIVATE PROPERTY (most specifically the books in the childrens section of the bookstore his cronies invaded and defaced). FREE SPEECH IS FREE SPEECH. THIS IS BROKEN IDEALISM IN ITS MOST ACCEPTED FORM; I'M FROM THE GOVERNMENT AND I'M HERE TO HELP YOU."

Ive wanted to start a blog and put up some points of interest but I'm thinking it will detract from my music making time, since time is of the essence of success I will focus on making a small label site where I will pedal my digital trinkets.

On the subject of David Icke:

I think that the ridiculousness of his apparent belief, which he's consistently modifying to a base of ever more science/nonfiction, that only serves to separate the psychically aware from the induced masses who rely on surface dialogs as a means for psychic consumption, reinforcing their statis as pawns and mongrels while upholding the old relationships of power, both physical and mental.


Register / login
You must be a member to reply or post. signup or login