| StoreTags: salt water, Energy, Florida, John Kanzius
Author: Gejius on July 02 2007 Viewed 3302 times. 9 people liked this blog. You can rate it below if you haven't already.
-->
I heard about this before I saw it just now. Some guy mentioned it to me and a friend earlier today, and he was going on how he was a communist and that this sort of technology belongs to the people. I just said, yeah, yeah, totally and walked off. I thought he was out of it or something. Then I searched for the video he mentioned. Holy moly.
After seeing this I immediately thought, isn't there a movie that starts like this? Then this guy becomes a target for terrorists hired by the oil companies and is hunted down with only Jean Claude VanDamme at his side.
Just watch the video. And pray that this guy doesn't die.
link | |
Comments
07/03/07
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
purple
with the lovely kate humble, oh yes.
07/03/07
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
phundamental
omg what a communist that guy, it's basically evil, fake and anti-american just like open source
07/03/07
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
soft
no.
its basically bullshit.
just like eeeerrrrrr bullshit
07/03/07
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
mlbot
bla, isn't electrolysis the process of removing unsightly body hairs? AND it can turn silver into photgraphic paper? At the same time??
pics or stfu
07/03/07
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
phundamental
i think that scientists should sent their articles and other papers to be peer reviewed to em411.com
07/03/07
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
soft
i think you are one of the biggest pricks ive ever had the pleasure of not meeting.
link
so you agree with this guy phunky?
or do you just disagree with everything anyone ever says/has an opinion on?
its one or the other.
07/03/07
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
phundamental
he hasn't really stated anything to agree on though, it's not like he's all "This is going to save the world!" he's more like "look isn't this cool? i bet there are practical uses to this" so it's not one or the other. and stop being such a lousy troll, you're attempts at flame bait are both unfunny and ineffective.
07/03/07
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
phundamental
i also seriously doubt any of you has any idea what they are talking about either, even less then that guy
07/03/07
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
mlbot
lol, phundamental the ever wise and on-topic has spoken
07/03/07
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
phundamental
lol, good one high five
07/03/07
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
soft
"If I were to be bold enough, I think one day you could power an automobile with this, eventually,"
its quite simple....
more energy in than the resulting energy out = not efficient ... that is the general view of the people that posted in the thread.
you either dont understand that or you just like to disagree with everything.
no body said he was evil or anything ... just that it doesnt make sense to use a fuckload of electricity to make a little flame to turn a turbine.
what is the problem with saying that? are we not allowed to say what seems quite obvious?
i wasnt trying to flame bait. i was stating my opinion. which still stands.
07/03/07
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
lunatinker
R & D is taking place all over the world using hydrogen in some way for fuel alternatives.
this is a strange but mildly amusing offshoot.
look up fast-breeder reactors. that does not seem like a probable thesis, yet works like a dirty radiating charm.
whatever. good luck to anyone who can make us fuel that doesn't make me throw up whenever i ride in a car.
07/03/07
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
monkvolcano
i've got your flame bait for you - in the form of a glass of salt water.
07/03/07
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
Plissken
07/04/07
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
p1ay3rtw0
Man, guys give this guy a break.
Who cares if it uses more energy than it produces at this point?
It's a freaking experiment.
Do you think the first cars got good gas mileage? did people still find it amazing anyway?
He says "eventually" he'd like to see his invention powering cars ect. he knows it's just a working idea at this point it needs a lot of work.
Why are so many dismissive of this. It's like your all saying this:
"If this TV executive can't solve the world energy problems with an invention designed to do something else, then he should fook off"
Give me a break. If he stumbled on to this while circuit bending you'd all be whistling a different tune I'd bet.
Register / login
|
^
EM411 is Copyright 2001-2008 EM411.com
All rights reserved. | Contact | RSS
|
