LA, California, USA
About me
a FAQ for ariel\\\'s dogs
GORDON FAQ:
q: where does gordon like to poop?
a: he is very picky about where he likes to poop. he tends to choose a different area everytime, about a mile away from the house on a walk. sometimes the person walking gordon will be able to suggest spots for him. bear in mind there is no template for a good spot-sometimes the area is grassy, sometimes he like to poop in a bush. mostly, he likes the poop to be out of the way. we think this comes from when he was a young puppy, and the people at the farm where he used to live would throw things at the giant pack of rotweiler puppies when they started to poop somewhere where they could see.
q: why does gordon act like he\\\'s been abused?
a: we\\\'ve been trying to figure that one out forever. ariel\\\'s had him since he was 6 weeks old, and she doesn\\\'t hit animals. probably it has something to do with him being a runt in the litter-all his brothers were big dopey rots, and he has a more slender lab appearance, so he probably got his share of beatings in the womb. he\\\'s mercurial.
q: why does gordon \\"do bitings\\"?
a: we think that\\\'s his nervous response to everything. although, it may have its root from when ariel was in college, living with a bunch of dirty hippies with fleas.
q: why does gordon get \\"stinkface\\"?
a: he likes to diguise himself from bigger dogs. he thinks \\"i\\\'ll just smell like a nice dead bird and nobody\\\'ll know i\\\'m here\\".
q: what are some ways to address gordon?
a: \\"best boy\\" sometimes pronounced \\"bist buwey\\" as in \\"he IS bist buueey\\". \\"speak boy,\\" \\"stink face,\\" \\"peanutbutter eyebrows,\\" \\"dancing peanutbutter,\\" \\"puppycakes,\\" \\"best swimming boy,\\" and \\"a real best boy\\" are also acceptable.
q: why does \\"his lip get all messed up\\"?
a: sometimes, when he\\\'s very focused, like on \\"some fishes\\" or a nice work of art, he\\\'ll close his mouth carelessly and get a hanglip.
q: what are some of the grammamtical subtleties i need to know to communicate with gordon?
a: he can spell, but only a few words like \\"w-a-l-k\\" and \\"l-e-a-s-h\\". also, present tense and third person are usually prefered such as \\"gordon goes to the puppy park\\" and \\"gordon wants a treat\\". however, the grammar is always in dispute.
q: what kinds of music does gordon like?
a: the more off-the-wall, the better. he especially likes conlon nancarrow and karlheinz stockhausen. seriously.
OLIVER FAQ:
q: why is he so goddamn cute?
a: because he has no soul.
q: why doesn\\\'t he have a soul?
a: because he\\\'s so goddamn cute.
q: is he a girl? is he a miniature lassie? OMF HE\\\'S SOOOO CUTE
a: no, kind of, he\\\'s the devil.
q: where does oliver like to poop?
a: in the same spot in the neighbor\\\'s ivy every day.
q: why does he get up all indignant when i sit next to him?
a: because he\\\'s a little bastard.
q: what kinds of music does oliver like?
a: pop music, like kelly clarkson and ashlee simpson.
q: can i pet him?
a: you can try.
q: is he really that cute?
a: you\\\'d want to drop an anvil on him.
My Gear
fat man
little shirt
|
Electronic Music other: wrong personality
Store
Written June 05 2009 , Tags: self-centered, boring, long
i don't really have the personality to be a musician. total introvert, couldn't give a shit about playing onstage. i don't really have the personality to be a composer either, i use abstract reasoning too much, not enough feeling and sensing, to use the meyers-briggs terms.
the archetypes are seemingly set in stone. if you say you make a lot of music, people assume that you're going to be a performer in some sense of the word. and i'm just simply not.
often i feel like there's something wrong with me because of this, like i'm the laziest scientist in the world who couldn't be bothered with actual equations, or like i'm a totally insensitive composer who has no business trying to make art. i couldn't even be an art critic because i don't discriminate well.
and the funny thing about it? i feel like i'm totally right and the world is wrong. lol
SUCK IT HUMANITY
so what are you like? does your musical output match your personality?
Comments
06/05/09
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
electrodan
lol
You just miss the days of playing Harlequin Duck gigs on my folks' driveway.
06/05/09
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
jdg
thats why i stick to audio engineering.
enuf science and enuf art, just not enuf money
06/05/09
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
piege
" i don't really have the personality to be a composer either, i use abstract reasoning too much, not enough feeling and sensing, to use the meyers-briggs terms."
what about countless modernist composers. xenakis is the best example (and probably the best-sounding too!)
Jun 05*
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
Roshi
I think you just need to achieve a better synthesis.
A lot of mid 20th century music is boring to me because it's just a boring mind game to these people. Serialism can suck it. Too many of them were beholden to their methods. Messaien to me is the exception.
Spectralism is really interesting to me now because it achieves a synthesis of science and art that I find really alarming.
06/05/09
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
piege
I agree that serialism (minus Webern and Messiaen!) is pretty bad on the whole, as was a lot of mid 20th c classical stuff.
Xenakis, again, I think is full of vitality and emotion despite its scientific basis.
Spectralism, especially Saariaho is enchantingly good.
06/05/09
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
craque
Messaien is not a serialist, I'm not sure if that was miscommunicated or not, now that I read back.
But anyway, a great deal of Messaien's work was taken from the world around him, he did some amazing things collecting, cataloging, and subsequently using (transliterated) birdsong in his work. Quartet for the End of Time is one of my favorite works by him.
At any rate, nothing is set in stone. the wonderful thing about art in the first place is that it is made from the mind of an individual. the "systems" and -isms we catalog things by are nothing but academics. When you start to break down the boundaries, when you really start looking into all these composers' activities, you see that they are much less pigeonholed than a lot of people make them out to be.
Ever heard some of Aaron Copland's REALLY experimental avant-garde shit? Most of it is. The crap you hear in the beef commercials and airplane TV ads or whatever, Appalachian Spring, etc.... these were his most popular pieces, EVER. And you'd immediately classify him in the same category as Gershwin or something. But when you really dig deep, Copland was as much of a maverick as Schoenberg or Cage.
So I guess my point is that you just need to follow your own instincts, don't let the external definitions shape you. I have a hard time with this at times too, because I don't quite know what it may mean to write a "pop song", or what it is to write "electronica", so if I combine things my OWN way, it becomes neither.
But I think that's the point. 
06/05/09
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
astroid
curtis roads is a monolith of modern science music for me.
serialism CAN suck it. it's a totally transitional form: playing scrabble with the language of high german romanticism. at least it led to stockhausen and some others finally throwing out the little bewigged 12-tet baby with his rotten bathwater. again, minus webern and messian. and schoenberg. and alban berg, pierre boulez, actually i love it!
Jun 05*
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
Roshi
Yeah, I know Messiaen is not a serialist. But they did take many of his techniques into their arsenal. I was referring to a lot of the mid century composers whose work is 
Academic music was ruled by serialist composers in the universities way too long. They rejected anything that wasn't of that sort.
Also: Boulez is an asshole.
06/05/09
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
Roshi
(I'm just being inflammatory)
06/05/09
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
Roshi
Anyway, I would say just to start taking math classes and start understanding how spectral analysis really works, or read something like:
Psychology of Music (Carl Seashore)
Music, Sound and Sensation
The other big one (the helmholtz one)
I think you just need to internalize the math somewhat so it becomes instinctual rather than intellectual (yes, this is an INFP talking)
06/05/09
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
astroid
lol infp if i tell you you're wrong you'll tell me i'm missing the point. i married one of your sick breed.
06/05/09
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
zfigz
yeah, i'm pretty confused at what i'm trying to do with making music. i'm a performer, but not a musical performer. i love to dance and draw crowds to my original dance. when i make music, i go about it in such a terse and rigid way.
meh, poo loo on the koo koo.
Jun 05*
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
Roshi
astroid said: "lol infp if i tell you you're wrong you'll tell me i'm missing the point. i married one of your sick breed."
It's not my fault you were born without a heart. 
06/05/09
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
electrodan
Bru,
if you went back to focusing on being an instrumentalist, you would doubtless be more extroverted in your musicality. right?
you're a born, natural composer, a good one. Your outlets are more centered on satisfying your own curiosity, imagination, and exploratory nature.
06/05/09
+
PM |
QUOTE |
PERMALINK |
REPORT
astroid
i'm not uncontent with who i am. i probably should have specified that it'd be interesting to hear how people's personalities affect their musics, genre preferences and such. 
Signup to comment
|